miércoles, 16 de noviembre de 2016
domingo, 6 de noviembre de 2016
What British People Say, Versus What They Mean
We are delivering our Teaching Vocabulary presentation the following class! Related to one of the aspects we are going to deal with, such as `meaning´ its denotation, connotation and appropriateness, I found interesting to share with you the chart bellow.
It´s funny and amazing at the same time! Language is definitely more than words. |
martes, 18 de octubre de 2016
Why I Homeschool? Sir Ken Robinson - multiple intelligences
I want to share with you this video . I found it super interesting and, of course, really funny! Enjoy it!
domingo, 11 de septiembre de 2016
sábado, 20 de agosto de 2016
martes, 2 de agosto de 2016
lunes, 25 de julio de 2016
sábado, 9 de julio de 2016
jueves, 30 de junio de 2016
miércoles, 22 de junio de 2016
Chomsky´s nativist approach
Chomsky´s nativist approach
Regarding
Chomsky´s nativist position, it can be said that it is an alternative to understand
and explain language acquisition. In fact, this approach has changed completely
the way in which acquisition was interpreted up to that moment. For many years,
acquisition was associated with Skinner´s theory of behaviorism. However,
Chomsky comes to conceptualizes language acquisition as knowledge
and it has nothing to do with behavior. That is to say, behaviorism cannot
account for human beings´ language acquisition because it has been shown that the
´stimulus´ and `response´ argument is vague and, sometimes, stimulus is
discovered from the response; whereas what we know is what really matters. Besides, many aspects of syntax, for
example, cannot be learnt from outside. They are built into the mind, Chomsky
explanation: “what we know innately.”
Chomsky claims that “acquiring language means progressing from not
having any language, S0, to having full competence (efficient use of the
language) Ss”. Here, he refers to states of the language faculty where we, as
babies, are in an Initial ´state and
reach a final state as adults. That is to say, we start from an initial S0 and
go through a sequence of stages S1, S2 and so on, and finally we arrive at this
“final
stage”. It includes a core grammar which provides the principles
and parameters of UG (universal grammar), `which is the common possession of all human beings´, and those,
which are more variable, peripheral grammar and a mental lexicon of idiosyncratic
items.
Taking into account The LAD model (Language Acquisition Device), the device is metaphorically known as a
black box through which input, as primary linguistic data, is processed to
produce output as a generative grammar. Chomsky refers to the goals of
linguistic in three `levels of adequacy´:
the observational, the descriptive and the explanatory. The first one has to do
with the samples of language (data), the second one refers to linguistic
competence and the third aims to provide a principled basis.
Regarding first language
acquisition and the nature of evidence available to children, Chomsky states
that children need some kind of evidence
to acquire a language. There are different types. One of them is got from observations within the observation they can learn from rules or deduce from the mistakes,
that is to say, “learning as well as from what to do and what not to do”. Apart
from that, the evidence can be positive
or negative. Actually, Chomsky mentions three logically possible types of evidence
for acquisition. The first one is the `positive evidence´ that set a parameter
of the core grammar to a particular value. There is second evidence known as `direct
negative evidence´ which correspond to the corrections of the speech community.
The third is ` indirect negative evidence’ which refers to the forms that
children usually do not hear. Finally, there are two requirements: occurrence and uniformity. Children
need to be shown that something does occur but parental explanations of the Binding Principles actually do not
occur. The conclusion is that “acquisition
cannot crucially depend upon correction.”
To sum up, Chomsky´s nativist position has introduced this idea of “Innateness” and has shown how humans acquire language. It has left almost aside the paradigm of the “outside” and physical explanation for language acquisition.
lunes, 20 de junio de 2016
sábado, 4 de junio de 2016
Profesora S. Racker
English and its teaching III - 2016
|
|||
Theme: The Weather
|
very young
learners-2nd/3rd form primary school
|
||
TASKS
|
MACROFUNCTIONS
|
MICROFUNCTIONS
|
GRAMMAR
|
Look at the
video Zootopia - Funny moments. Teacher ask s the group of learners. What ´s the weather like?
|
Exchanging goods and services
|
Asking for
and giving weather conditions
|
They, at least, will mention the vocabulary: Windy- raining-cold-sunny-foggy
|
In pairs talk
about the scenes. One asks the other one if s/he remembers what the weather is at that
particular scene. The teacher monitors and helps them. She will play a particular scene if it
necessary. They will have a chart in which they will write the chosen option.
|
Socializing
|
Exhanging personal information
|
For me,
It´s windy in scene 1./ or number
1: It is windy.Number 2: It is raining. No! For me it isn´t raining. It´s
cold.
|
Decide what
is the correct weather in each scene. Complete the chart. (E.g. Scene 1: It´s
windy. Scene 2: it´s… ) Finally, they will
check it.
|
Exchanging good and services
|
Expressing the weather
|
Use of
It´s … to express the
weather. Previous vocabulary: Bunny-tiger-wolves-bear-mum dad-
|
Zootopia Scene Chat
|
|||
Scene
|
Weather
|
||
Scene 1 Bunny
|
It´s windy
|
||
Scene2 Bunny and the tiger
|
It´s raining
|
||
Scene3 Bunny and the bear
|
It´s cold
|
||
Scene4 Bunny and mum and dad
|
It´s sunny
|
||
Scene 5 Bunny
and the wolves
|
It´s foggy
|
domingo, 29 de mayo de 2016
domingo, 15 de mayo de 2016
jueves, 5 de mayo de 2016
Suscribirse a:
Entradas (Atom)